Free web hosting user's review posts are 4,589 posts.
100Gb [FH](Inactive) reviewed by polas, IP 78.62.165.X, When 25 Apr 11 : Rated= 2
And you say it\\\'s free?
Ha ha don\\\'t kidding me.
It so bulshit not hosting and it is not free are blind or what and do not see that it is not for free
100Gb [FH](Inactive) reviewed by Mike, IP 173.187.105.X, When 24 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
great hosting. I can tell before getting approved and everything. I'm still pending but when everything gets done, I am able to get onto my new website, I will get everything updated. I'm going to spread the word to everyone.
HostWebsitesFree [FH](Inactive) reviewed by Mike, IP 173.187.105.X, When 24 Apr 11 : Rated= 3
It\'s good and all but they have nothing for free without forced ads. They want you to get the other one with forced ads. They suck.
IrisHoster [FH](Inactive) reviewed by James H., IP 92.81.15.X, When 24 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
Great site for the functionality and for free... I\'m pretty new to it, but I am impressed so far .
Nice web, nice features, & powerfull ones.
AtSpace [FH] reviewed by S.Holland, IP 50.55.191.X, When 23 Apr 11 : Rated= 2
I am a long-time (50MB) Atspace user in the US. But since February, 2011, I have numerous complaints from patrons reporting they receive "unable to access server" failure messages particularly on weekends. I have verified this myelf. Cennection improves on Mondays but tends to worsen evenings. "Tickets" to Atspace Support seems ineffective and unresponsive. Direct report to Zettahost Support results in an email, but the weekend connection issues remain. I am wondering if Zettahost is outsourcing Atspace servers to third party clients to generate income and the high data volume from Atspace servers causes connection failures. Whatever the cause, Atspace connection issues compromise any advantage they once had over other website hosts. So whether free or premium, if you and your patrons need consistent and trouble-free access to your website, please seriously consider my warning to avoid Atspace.
0000Free [FH](Inactive) reviewed by gannimu , IP 115.216.104.X, When 22 Apr 11 : Rated= N/A
It is really a good one for to be here. After a long wait i have got this. So like me any one can join here.really a good one for to be here. After a long wait i have got this.
AwardSpace [FH] reviewed by gregary, IP 66.90.122.X, When 21 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
Awardspace's hosting plans are really safe and secure. I used to host my websites on GoDaddy before and some hackers were able to destroy my sites every now and then despite all the so called “security enhancers” or whatever they are called that go daddy offers. Since I switched to awardspace everything is fine.
Host-ed [FH] reviewed by Al.ToN, IP 108.62.48.X, When 21 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
I’ve heard some good words for Host-ed from a friend of mine. When I sign up for their plan I didn’t know how to use all these features but I called a couple of times to the support center and they answered all my questions. Now I can say that I can manage many sites on my own.
1gb.me [FH](Inactive) reviewed by Mr. Roboto., IP 209.89.161.X, When 20 Apr 11 : Rated= N/A
WARNING: THIS HOST MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE SUSPICIOUS/MALICIOUS CONTENT. I signed up for a site under the co-branded 0009.ws service, and discovered a nasty surprise. These folks require you to pay “a small fee” to whitelist your new freely hosted website OR they inject a page filled with advertising stating quite boldly that “This website may or may not contain malicious/suspicious content” and force the visitor to click a button that will allow access to the site in question. If that wasn’t bad enough, now the redirect does not work and my site is totally inaccessable. Does not load. Does not compute.
Free is not truly free if you want your page to be visitable.
AwardSpace [FH] reviewed by BimBrown, IP 95.154.230.X, When 20 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
My hosting experience with Awardspace started about an year ago when I was searching for a web hosting provider that was eco-friendly. There was no way I could miss on Awardspace.
IrisHoster [FH](Inactive) reviewed by Alex , IP 85.204.142.X, When 19 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
This is very good hosting service. I just registered with them a week ago.
Nice hosting site with lots of free services, support is ok, it's friendly. I have several free accounts with them.
Service just works, no issues, no problems.. I've now upgraded to a paid account and I'm completely satisfied. I can recommend IrisHoster.co.uk to everyone who is looking for low bugdet or free web hosting.
100Gb [FH](Inactive) reviewed by Povver.com, IP 122.200.149.X, When 19 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
I can not comment, because everything is written with a very correct in the comments. quick service, fast hosting, Cpanel menu all the way there are no restrictions, no ads, 100% free. Last comment is the best 100GB
AwardSpace [FH] reviewed by sole, IP 173.244.219.X, When 19 Apr 11 : Rated= 9
I have two paid accounts with AwardSpace. It's good but it's not something spectacular. I have some small problems from time to time.
AwardSpace [FH] reviewed by zack, IP 184.107.21.X, When 18 Apr 11 : Rated= 9
No longer we have to play the “try the new web hosting provider” game with our family. We've found Awardspace at last and we have all that we need plus more.
100Gb [FH](Inactive) reviewed by Joe, IP 24.222.27.X, When 18 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
IrisHoster [FH](Inactive) reviewed by Moris E., IP 92.82.126.X, When 18 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
- If your looking for a Free / Paid Cloud host with great features, This host is for you.
The best! I love this host! They are fast with support and they actually MAINTAIN the Servers unlike some of my former hosts who simply would let the drives fail and wait a week to replace them.
All in all, this host has everything would could ask for plus the Free package is filled with some nice features, too.
Uptime is great and so far I have not seen any noticeable downtime.
Very Satisfied IrisHoster customer.
100Gb [FH](Inactive) reviewed by lucas, IP 80.58.205.X, When 18 Apr 11 : Rated= 10
increible hosting, the best