Free web hosting user's review posts are 4,606 posts.
PerfectZ [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Egzon Bunjaku, IP x.x.x.X, When 29 Aug 10 : Rated= N/A
Great free hosting!
345mb [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Annoymous, IP 99.100.37.X, When 28 Aug 10 : Rated= 8
This webhost is very good. Auto-script installer, large enough webspace and bandwidth, ftp, and ad-free.
The only things that could use major improvement is the site uptime and the loading time. The uptime is only 94.5% when I started, so occasionally it drives me nuts, but most of the time it does not matter. The page loading takes a while, but it's not too much of a concern.
Overall, for starting only 2 months from today, I am impressed an expect more features to come in the future.
0000Free [FI](Inactive) reviewed by email@example.com, IP 72.229.149.X, When 28 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
So I just recently got 0000free basic.. I'm amazed. Mind=Blown. Fastest free hosting on the internet IMO! The cPanel is neat and elegant, the support is epic.. the staff is amazingly friendly. I say this is the BEST FREE HOST!
HeyUp [FI](Inactive) reviewed by ssi, IP 84.198.97.X, When 28 Aug 10 : Rated= 2
Hosting worked perfectly for several months. now, for the second week in a row, it is inaccessible and impossible to logon to the controlpanel, due to "account under review"
no notification, no information what so ever. Even contacting support is impossible because you need to login first.
bottom line: it was good while it lasted, but I'm moving.
0000Free [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Dannoooo, IP 212.227.101.X, When 27 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
Very high quality hosting/friendly community/great features
Oni [FI](Inactive) reviewed by ben, IP 76.93.9.X, When 27 Aug 10 : Rated= 9
good hosting provider
PingHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Chimer, IP 124.189.148.X, When 26 Aug 10 : Rated= 1
They were great when I signed up...but since then I've had ridiculous amounts of downtime. The latest downtime has been over a week now, so I'm taking my site somewhere it can actually be seen.
0000Free [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Darren K., IP 174.36.199.X, When 25 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
The best yet! I've been bouncing from host to host a lot lately, and this one seems to offer the most. Very good site IMO, will update another review when I have tested them a bit more - but feature wise, it's the best.
Host-ed [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Shishas, IP 87.118.93.X, When 25 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
I have 2 sites with them. Customer service is just fine. All my support requests are handled under 15 minutes. They even re-installed my content management system for me after they found out the problem I had stemmed from me installing the wrong version.
Great features. Their prices are great but not the cheapest. I highly recommend these guys!
ZebBix [FI](Inactive) reviewed by mike mcdonald, IP 212.50.162.X, When 25 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
this place is ok, control panel broke when i was using it but could
still use ftp and could still access my website, they got the cp
working again a few hours later. control panel seems a bit rubbish,
think its xpanel (imo xpanel is the worst why do hosts use it?)
HostShield [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Fajri Holic, IP x.x.x.X, When 24 Aug 10 : Rated= N/A
hostshield why can not I access?
myownfreeweb [FI](Inactive) reviewed by firstname.lastname@example.org, IP 174.27.47.X, When 23 Aug 10 : Rated= 1
This website has NO SUPPORT !!!!!!!!
I have lost password and have submitted 10 E-mails to support
and not 1 answer !!!!!!!!!!
0000Free [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Minye Kyawswar, IP x.x.x.X, When 22 Aug 10 : Rated= N/A
0000Free [FI](Inactive) reviewed by RothBurger, IP 192.251.226.X, When 18 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
Signed up yesterday, was a bit annoying and confusing sign up process, and took a few hours before my account was created. But seems to be worth it, so far everything works good, and there are lots of features. Had an issue today with my domains and posted for support .. again, took a few hours to get a reply, BUT my problem was fixed on the first try, so no issues there. If it were paid hosting I'd rate it a 6, but since it's free, it's a 10. Way better service than I pay for :)
0000Free [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Serephim, IP 173.244.197.X, When 17 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
The best there is. Seriously, at least the best hosting. Good service, good speed, good support and no cost, what more could you want? I'm happy to support my host, they are good guys, and saved me a bundle I don't have!
UltraGb [FI](Inactive) reviewed by NOT FREE, IP 71.115.24.X, When 17 Aug 10 : Rated= 1
This host is NOT free and shouldn't be in the Free CPanel category!
Zoka.cc [FI](Inactive) reviewed by email@example.com, IP 112.135.215.X, When 17 Aug 10 : Rated= 9
V good job
0000Free [FI](Inactive) reviewed by hotlady3x@y*****.com, IP 188.165.47.X, When 16 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
Sysop is a sweetheart <3 - helped me with my own stupid problems. Unlike most free host forums, they are not pricks here that think they are better than everyone, and don't make you feel stupid for asking questions. Other than that, hosting itself is good, not as good as paid hosting I have used in the past, but .. you get what you pay for (or even a little more here)
PandaPoint [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Jerry , IP 75.32.189.X, When 16 Aug 10 : Rated= 10
This one works fine.
The sign-up script runs fine, and the account was created within a couple of hours. An email message arrived promptly after the account was created and contained most of the information I needed. By experimenting, I found I had to upload my files to the folder called "httpdocs".
User pages are served quickly, and contain no hidden JS off-site calls (i.e. "stats," "counters," or "urchins") that slow down page loading. No tracking cookies are left behind.
ATBHost [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Peeves, IP 67.159.44.X, When 16 Aug 10 : Rated= 1
Staff is rude and incompetent. Support tickets and posts are closed without the question being anywhere near answered. They might as well respond with "I like cheese" to all support requests because it would be just as helpful as what they write now. Staff blames EVERYTHING on client-side and NEVER even CONSIDERS that it may be server-side...when tons of people are having the EXACT same problem, it's NOT client-side, assholes!