FreeHostsFinder

Free web hosting user's review posts are 4,610 posts.

FileFactory [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Master V, IP 96.31.114.X, When 26 Apr 12 : Rated= N/A
TERRIBLE SITE - BELOW I POST AN EMAIL WITH 'CUSTOMER SERVICE'

NOTE: In the original email reply my comments were blue and in parenthesis (), but as I can not keep rich text here, I have changed the layout as follows. I've broken the paragraph sentences to individual lines & double spaced between paragraphs. The original message from the customer service rep is first on the line and begins begins with . My reply comments will then be placed after <<---
----------------------------------------------
From: MasterV
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 22:14
To: 'FileFactory Support Center'
Subject: RE: [FileFactory Support Center] Re: SCREWED UP

[fault]<<---You have got to be kidding……

[warning]I'm not too sure what the problem is here. [fault]<<---(WHAT??)
[warning]We provide a premium service for the people who are willing to pay.[fault]<<---(No kidding! That would seem to be the issue at hand.)
[warning]To ensure they get the best possible service, we restrict those who don't feel the need to pay for such a service. If you don't want to spend the very reasonable price of $12 for a months premium, that's fine, but you then have to download under the free user restrictions.[fault]<<---(“free user restrictions” Don’t you mean free user NON-Existence!! By your own admittance in paragraph 3, you are fully aware of the fact that you fraudulently CLAIM a free user accessibility when you in fact DO NOT actually fulfill it! That is, in fact, the definition of ‘fraud’.)


[warning]We don't and never have defrauded anyone.[fault]<<---(16 weeks of repeatedly failing to fulfill your download obligation is fraud. Therefore, the party to which that download is due has been ‘defrauded’. See definition below. Or are you attempting to imply here that I am not anyone, aka a nobody, as you have been sent video proof of this fraud taking place?)
[warning]If you're not interested in upgrading to the premium service which would allow you to bypass the free slots, then I'm afraid you will need to try and download this file at a later date.[fault]<<---(It’s already been 16 weeks.)
[warning]We are installing new servers over the coming days which will reduce the load on a lot of the current servers and open more download slots for free users.[fault]<<---(More non-existent ‘download slots’? More of nothing is still nothing!)


[warning]I raised the problem of the download slot notification after the timer to the techs last week and it's been put into the queue, just like everything else.[fault]<<---(And here we find the soon to be notorious paragraph 3 where you admit full prior knowledge of your activities. Which, by the way, completely contradicts your very first sentence.)

[fault]<<---defraud [dɪˈfrɔːd]
[fault]<<---vb
[fault]<<---(Law) (tr) to take away or withhold money, rights, property, etc., from (a person) by fraud; cheat; swindle


[fault]Bcc: ICD
------------------------------------------------------
[bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad]
A Truly worthless site. Re: SCREWED UP

<<---You have got to be kidding……

I'm not too sure what the problem is here. <<---(WHAT??)
We provide a premium service for the people who are willing to pay.<<---(No kidding! That would seem to be the issue at hand.)
To ensure they get the best possible service, we restrict those who don't feel the need to pay for such a service. If you don't want to spend the very reasonable price of $12 for a months premium, that's fine, but you then have to download under the free user restrictions.<<---(“free user restrictions” Don’t you mean free user NON-Existence!! By your own admittance in paragraph 3, you are fully aware of the fact that you fraudulently CLAIM a free user accessibility when you in fact DO NOT actually fulfill it! That is, in fact, the definition of ‘fraud’.)


We don't and never have defrauded anyone.<<---(16 weeks of repeatedly failing to fulfill your download obligation is fraud. Therefore, the party to which that download is due has been ‘defrauded’. See definition below. Or are you attempting to imply here that I am not anyone, aka a nobody, as you have been sent video proof of this fraud taking place?)
If you're not interested in upgrading to the premium service which would allow you to bypass the free slots, then I'm afraid you will need to try and download this file at a later date.<<---(It’s already been 16 weeks.)
We are installing new servers over the coming days which will reduce the load on a lot of the current servers and open more download slots for free users.<<---(More non-existent ‘download slots’? More of nothing is still nothing!)


I raised the problem of the download slot notification after the timer to the techs last week and it's been put into the queue, just like everything else.<<---(And here we find the soon to be notorious paragraph 3 where you admit full prior knowledge of your activities. Which, by the way, completely contradicts your very first sentence.)

<<---defraud [dɪˈfrɔːd]
[fault]<<---vb
[fault]<<---(Law) (tr) to take away or withhold money, rights, property, etc., from (a person) by fraud; cheat; swindle


[fault]Bcc: ICD
------------------------------------------------------
[bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad][bad]
A Truly worthless site.
<<---vb
<<---(Law) (tr) to take away or withhold money, rights, property, etc., from (a person) by fraud; cheat; swindle


Bcc: ICD
------------------------------------------------------

A Truly worthless site.ruly worthless site.worthless site.less site.site.

HostCrypt [FI](Inactive) reviewed by jojo (R), IP 71.176.80.X, When 26 Apr 12 : Rated= N/A
It was great while it lasted. The owner must have found it too time consuming to keep up with all of the bogus account applications, spammers etc. The server has been down for over a month and there has been no sign of the admin/owner on the support forum for well over a month.

Appears to have been abandoned.

RCDhost [FI](Inactive) reviewed by admin (R), IP XXX, When 24 Apr 12 : Rated= N/A
Thanks to asgard again.

England-Hosting [FI](Inactive) reviewed by admin (R), IP XXX, When 24 Apr 12 : Rated= N/A
Thanks to asgard your post.

RCDhost [FI](Inactive) reviewed by asgard, IP 82.54.164.X, When 24 Apr 12 : Rated= 1
Fake host; link leads you to one of those frauding surveys where they offer you the newest Apple products just to get their hands on your data.

England-Hosting [FI](Inactive) reviewed by asgard, IP 82.54.164.X, When 24 Apr 12 : Rated= 1
Fake host; link leads you to one of those frauding surveys where they offer you the newest Apple products just to get their hands on your data.

3owl [FI](Inactive) reviewed by asgard, IP 82.54.164.X, When 24 Apr 12 : Rated= 10
I\'ve been hosting with them for nearly a month, now: all perfect, not the tiniest glitch.

Capnix [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Goldishbird, IP 223.237.6.X, When 24 Apr 12 : Rated= 1
Hi , Read a lot of good reviews about Capnix.
Opened an account but when I tried to create a doamin on Capnix, it won't let me do.I ve been trying to do so for last three days.Even logged the fault ticket twice, No response.
The service is awful.
Good bye Capnix.

FreeWebo [FI](Inactive) reviewed by edward braham, IP 197.226.175.X, When 23 Apr 12 : Rated= N/A
Really a good website hosting....

FileFactory [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Simon, IP 68.174.39.X, When 22 Apr 12 : Rated= 1
I have been trying to download a file from filefactory. I have been trying for 1 week and it always says that all free download slots are in use and ask me to upgrade.
Although I found and downloaded the file elsewhere, I let my download manager try to download it from FF every 10 minutes over the weekend. There is no luck.
I am impressed.

Bammz [FI](Inactive) reviewed by alex, IP 67.168.205.X, When 22 Apr 12 : Rated= 1

they force you to register for some sweepstake type offers asking for your personal info.
very suspicious. never give your info away. rubbish server.

Hourb [FI](Inactive) reviewed by alex, IP 67.168.205.X, When 22 Apr 12 : Rated= 1

absolutely horrible server.
does not support unicode characters in file names.
seems fast at first but when you start accessing your files from it through your browser it times out.
large files are timing out I am storing large archives 50MB and up.
I cannot get 50mb file down from it in one piece.
Absolute rubbish of a server.

3owl [FI](Inactive) reviewed by www.firmanmaulana.tk, IP 103.3.223.X, When 22 Apr 12 : Rated= 10
What a Great Hosting Provider but they limit the maximum number of files to 1000 unit

UHostAll [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Karim, IP 111.119.185.X, When 20 Apr 12 : Rated= 10
Well i tried it , it is nice host

Capnix [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Admin, IP xxx.xxx.xxx.X, When 19 Apr 12 : Rated= N/A
Hi Matt,
It is IP rangs filtering, They(Youhosting reseller) not allow some country IPs to create an account.

Capnix [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Matt, IP 27.108.158.X, When 19 Apr 12 : Rated= 3
Help.. What is this error means? "unable to select server. Please try again later (#0097)..

1FreeHosting [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Bored, IP 178.128.175.X, When 19 Apr 12 : Rated= 1
hahaha
they ask $4 per ticket now

0000Cost [FI](Inactive) reviewed by lexus, IP 46.102.91.X, When 18 Apr 12 : Rated= 10
this host in the best

UHostAll [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Gulfam, IP 118.103.232.X, When 18 Apr 12 : Rated= 10
It is nice service , i never see downtime

0xh [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Jerry (R), IP 198.147.225.X, When 17 Apr 12 : Rated= 1
I'm moving this one into my "Probably Dead" category. It's been down for a week (See the "Uptime Report" above).